January 25th, 2012
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 25th, 2012

Update: Martin and the Yankees agreed to a deal worth $7.5 million with another possible $100K in incentives, Jon Heyman reported.
Original post: The Yankees announced on Tuesday that they avoided arbitration with catcher Russell Martin as the two sides reached an agreement on a one-year deal.
The two sides exchanged figures headed to arbitration last week with Martin asking for $8.2 million and the Yankees countering with $7 million. There is no word on what exactly they settled on, but something around $7.6 million seems likely.
This deal will keep Martin in Pinstripes for at least one more year and he will be a free agent next offseason. Brian Cashman has gone on record saying he would like a long-term deal with Martin, but he makes a practice of waiting until a player’s deal has expired before re-signing him.
Related Stories
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 25th, 2012
« Rays Designate Justin Ruggiano For Assignment |
Main
| Diamondbacks, Brad Ziegler Avoid Arbitration »
The Yankees and Russell Martin have avoided arbitration by agreeing to a one-year contract, the team announced. The Matt Colleran client filed for $8.2MM while the team countered with $7MM, as our Arbitration Tracker shows.
Martin, 28, signed a one-year deal worth $4MM with the Yankees last offseason after being non-tendered by the Dodgers. He hit .237/.324/.408 with 18 homers and eight steals during his first year in pinstripes, and remained under the team’s control are an arbitration-eligible player. This is his fourth time up for arbitration as a Super Two, and he’s eligible for free agency next winter.
Boone Logan is the Yankees’ only remaining unsigned arbitration-eligible player.
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 20th, 2012
FOR Hugo Chávez, sovereignty means never having to say you’re sorry. The Venezuelan president, who sees globalisation as an imperialist plot against developing countries, is determined to break free from all forms of international arbitration. His latest bid to de-couple his country from the rest of the world involves the World Bank’s International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), a tribunal which serves as an arbitrator for foreign-investment contracts. Venezuela, which has over a dozen cases against it pending, will no longer abide by ICSID rulings, the president said earlier this month.
Like many important government announcements, Mr Chávez made this one during one of his rambling, six- or seven-hour Aló Presidente (“Hello President”) Sunday television programmes. It came in response to a ruling in a different tribunal, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), on a dispute which is also pending at ICSID, involving the oil giant Exxon Mobil. To the surprise of many analysts, the ICC found Venezuela liable to pay only $908m, in compensation for its 2007 takeover of assets belonging to the company. Exxon had reportedly been looking for a sum rather closer to $6 billion.
Not surprisingly, perhaps, the Venezuelan government said it would abide by the ICC’s decision, which it says will lead to a net pay-out of only $255m. But that, it said, was that. “We don’t expect (to make) any further payment,” said Rafael Ramírez, the oil minister, who also chairs PDVSA, the state oil corporation. “There’s nothing left to decide.”
It may not be quite that simple. Although Mr Ramírez says Venezuela will shortly formalise its withdrawal from the ICSID, such a decision takes six months to become effective. During that time, further claims can be filed. All claims pending at the time of withdrawal remain active, and rulings can be implemented almost anywhere in the world. With assets abroad, especially in the United States, PDVSA will remain vulnerable. Moreover, some two dozen bilateral investment treaties already signed by Venezuela contemplate arbitration by the ICSID.
Regardless of the technical details, the government’s determination to be judge and jury in all international disputes will further damage its already-battered image among investors. Venezuela continues to attract foreign direct investment (FDI), especially in its oil and gas sectors, and in finance and telecommunications, even though nationalisations have taken net FDI figures into negative territory in recent years. But the signs are ominous. The government says henceforth all disputes will be settled in local courts, which are widely perceived to be wholly under the thumb of the executive.
That really comes down to Mr Chávez himself, who is prone to decree state takeovers of land, factories and other businesses with no prior notice, and with scant regard for the law or the constitution. Hitherto, foreign investors have at least had the protection of international courts and arbitration bodies. But local business people and landowners are not so lucky. The constitution forbids expropriation without a court order, and guarantees prompt compensation at a fair market price. Thousands, however, have received no payment at all, while others have been paid only in part. Few judges dare defy the president, so taking him to court is futile.
Mindful of such precedents, investors with enough clout, like the Chinese government, have insisted on international arbitration. Contracts between the China National Petroleum Corporation and PDVSA include a clause that refers any dispute to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre.
Mr Chávez is seeking re-election this year for a third consecutive six-year term. He may be concerned that a series of adverse, billion-dollar rulings by ICSID would knock a big hole in his campaign kitty, although the likelihood of that happening seems remote. Either way, it is possible that sense may eventually prevail. And there is also a chance that, by the time the ICSID notice period has expired, Mr Chávez will no longer be the president.
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 20th, 2012
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 20th, 2012
In a correction to the figure reported earlier this week, Matt Garza’s requested salary for 2012, in his third year of arbitration, was not a very high $10.225 million. Instead, it was a very, very high $12.5 million.
Bruce Levine reported the correction, and Jon Heyman explained that he misread the chart previously ($10.225 million is the midpoint between Garza’s ask – $12.5 million – and the Cubs’ offer – $7.95 million).
Buster Olney earlier tweeted that “[in the v]iew of rival executives: Matt Garza’s $10.225 million arbitration request greatly complicates any interest in him as a trade target.” I responded to Buster that the suggestion made no sense, given that the midpoint between that request and the Cubs’ offer was about $9 million, a salary most expected Garza would get for 2012. He added that teams want cost certainty, and “aren’t wild” about the idea of having to pay Garza $10.225 million in 2012. I wonder if Olney had his info right, but his number wrong.
The difference may seem slight, at first – it’s just $2 million. But you must remember, whatever salary Garza gets in 2012 will directly impact his salary in 2013, and will directly impact the starting point for negotiations on an extension.
This is kind of a big deal.
I’ll be going into greater detail on the case for each number soon, but, in short, Garza’s request is quite bold. Recall, if the case were to go to arbitration, only one number can be chosen – either the Cubs’ offer, or Garza’s request. There is no middle ground. Historically, teams have won arbitration cases at an approximately three to one rate, and Garza’s ask is very aggressive. It’s hard to see him winning, and instead looks designed to produce a high settlement from a President (Theo Epstein) whom Garza knows has never taken a player to arbitration.
Very shrewd. Very risky.
It could also be the case that Garza doesn’t particularly want to be part of a rebuilding team, and is trying to give the Cubs a nudge about getting him off the team – which would be unfortunate for the Cubs. The high request might make the Cubs more willing to trade Garza, but it makes him slightly less attractive on the trade market. The more I think about this, the more it is a bit of a bummer.
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 15th, 2012
Major League Baseball arbitration season is now in full swing. The number of players headed to arbitration….142.
The field of 142 is headed by the Giants ace pitcher Tim Lincecum who is set to ask for a record salary when arbitration figures are exchanged next week. The Giants are poised to offer Lincecum more than 14.25 million that the Yankees offered to Derek Jeter. Most players will settle before an arbitration hearing comes to pass. Last season, Lincecum made 13.1 million. He is looking for a big increase this time around.
Many other players are on the arbitration band wagon including the Dodgers Clayton Kershaw and Andre Ethier, Phillies pitcher Cole Hamels, Texans Mike Napoli and Cubs pitcher Matt Garza. The arbitration ranks also include 3 players who were former free agents that accepted their teams offers including Red Sox David Ortiz, Brewers reliever Francisco Rodriguez, and Toronto‘s Kelly Johnson.
The Padres have the most players in arbitration with 11 while the Chicago White Sox have zero players involved.
While 142 players might seem like a big number, it will be whittled down quite rapidly with players and teams agreeing on figures. Both the teams and players work to avoid an actual hearing. It is much easier and much more harmonious to team/player relations to have the deals worked out without going into a hearing situation. It also takes the risk out of the equation for both sides if they avoid the hearing process. Look for deals to be flying fast and furious.
In fact some deals have already been made including Martin Prado of the Braves, a much rumored possible trade prospect, who agreed to a 1 year, 4.75 million deal. Others who have signed deals include Phillies pitcher Kyle Kendrick, Red Sox outfielder Ryan Sweeney, and Pirates pitcher Chris Resop. The Cubs Kerry Wood and the Braves Jack Wilson also agreed to deals just in the last couple of days.
More deals are sure to follow at a rapid pace. Arbitration is underway and deals will be made quickly to avoid hearings…probably all 142 of them.
You Might Also Be Interested In These Similar Posts:
Tagged as:
baseball,
baseball arbitration,
baseball contracts,
MLB
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 15th, 2012
Roger Mooney
<!– –>
Roger Mooney covers the Rays for The Tampa Tribune, TBO.com and News Channel 8. He has covered the Rays since their first season in 1998, including 11 years for the Bradenton Herald. Roger has also covered Florida, South Florida and Florida State football, the Bucs and the Lightning.
@TBO_Rays
TBO_Rays
Roger Mooney
Send us your questions
More Links:
<!–
Sports Blog Search
–>
Most Recent Entries
More
Monthly Archives
Price, Upton, Howell, Badenhop, Niemann file for arbitration
Posted Jan 14, 2012 by Roger Mooney
Updated Jan 14, 2012 at 11:54 AM
ROGER MOONEY
David Price, B.J. Upton, J.P. Howell, Burke Badenhop and Jeff Niemann are five of the 142 major leaguers who filed for arbitration Friday.
The deadline for the representatives of each player and the Rays to exchange figures is noon Tuesday. Arbitration hearings begin Feb. 1 for those players who did not reach an agreement on a contract for 2012.
Price will receive the biggest jump in salary through this process. A Super 2 player, he opted out of the final year of his contract, which would have paid him $1.5 million this year.
The two-time All-Star who started on Opening Day in 2011 had a subpar season, going 12-13 with a 3.49 ERA after going 19-6 with a 2.72 ERA in 2010 when he was the American League Cy Young Award runner-up.
Price could be bumped up to the $4 million range.
Upton agreed to a $4.825 million contract last winter to avoid arbitration. His 23 home runs and 36 stolen bases in 2011 were matched by only two other major leaguers – Matt Kemp (39 home runs, 40 steals) and Jacoby Ellsbury (32, 39).
After moving to second in the order on Sept. 5, Upton batted .356 with 5 home runs, 14 RBI, 8 doubles, 10 walks, 8 stolen bases, a .462 on-base percentage and a .644 slugging percentage. He reached base in 22 of the 23 games played while batting second.
Those numbers should bring Upton’s salary into the $7 million neighborhood.
Howell made $1.1 million last season, when he struggled after coming back from the shoulder surgery that cost him the 2010 season.
Badenhop made $750,000 for the Marlins.
Niemann made $903,000.
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 15th, 2012
Posted in Arbitration law | No Comments »
January 9th, 2012
Scholarship • Events • Ideas
Posted in Arbitration law | Comments Off
|
|
Post a comment
Members:
<!– | Member List –>
(Requires free registration.)