<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arbitrationlaw.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info</link>
	<description>News on arbitration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UTLaw Magazine &#124; Symposium on “International Arbitration in Latin &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/utlaw-magazine-symposium-on-%e2%80%9cinternational-arbitration-in-latin/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/utlaw-magazine-symposium-on-%e2%80%9cinternational-arbitration-in-latin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/utlaw-magazine-symposium-on-%e2%80%9cinternational-arbitration-in-latin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Events Symposium on “International Arbitration in Latin America: State Intervention in Investor-State Disputes,” February 23, 2012 With the rise of globalization and international investment, a new field of international law has rapidly developed that defines the obligations of host states toward foreign investors.  On Thursday, February 23, 2012, the Law School will host a symposium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="post">
<p class="category_heading"><a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/events/" title="View all posts in Events" rel="category tag">Events</a></p>
</p>
<h2 class="pagetitle">Symposium on “International Arbitration in Latin America:  State Intervention in Investor-State Disputes,” February 23, 2012</h2>
<p>With the rise of globalization and international investment, a new field of international law has rapidly developed that defines the obligations of host states toward foreign investors.  On Thursday, February 23, 2012, the Law School will host a symposium on recent developments in international arbitrations arising between investors and Latin American governments. Please join us at noon in the <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/about/maps/">Jamail Pavilion</a> for lunch and then the symposium from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/about/maps/index.php?level=5">JON 5.206</a>. If you would like to attend, please RSVP to Gena Dawson at <a href="mailto:gdawson@law.utexas.edu">gdawson@law.utexas.edu</a>.</p>
<p>Featured speakers at the symposium are:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Andrés Jana</strong> of Bofill, Mir &amp; Alvarez in Santiago, Chile. Mr. Jana is one of the leading experts in Latin America on the law of international arbitration. He currently serves as Chile’s delegate to the United States Convention on International Trade Law.</li>
<li><strong>Dr. Alvaro Galindo</strong>, Director of the International Litigation and Arbitration Unit of the Solicitor General Office, Republic of Ecuador. Dr. Galindo has written extensively about the development of arbitration as a means of international dispute resolution in Ecuador.</li>
<li><strong>Jennifer Thornton</strong>, Special Counsel at Baker Botts LLP in Washington, D.C. Ms. Thornton is an expert on public international law and international investment arbitration.  Before joining Baker Botts, she was a member of the NAFTA/CAFTA arbitration team of the United States Department of State.</li>
<li><strong>James Loftis </strong>of Vinson &amp; Elkins in Houston. Mr. Loftis specializes in international dispute resolution and is an expert on international law and treaties.  He is also a member of the ICC Commission on Arbitration.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Contact:</strong> Gena Dawson, Center for Global Energy, International Arbitration, and Environmental Law, 512- 475-9328, <a href="mailto:gdawson@law.utexas.edu">gdawson@law.utexas.edu</a></p>
<p>Tags: <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/tag/alvaro-galindo/" rel="tag">Alvaro Galindo</a>, <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/tag/andres-jana/" rel="tag">Andrés Jana</a>, <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/tag/arbitration/" rel="tag">Arbitration</a>, <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/tag/center-for-global-energy-international-arbitration-and-environmental-law/" rel="tag">Center for Global Energy International Arbitration and Environmental Law</a>, <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/tag/jennifer-thornton/" rel="tag">Jennifer Thornton</a>, <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/tag/latin-america/" rel="tag">Latin America</a></p>
<p>			&lt;!&#8211;
<p class="postmetadata">This entry was posted<br />
								on Friday, February 17th, 2012 at 12:31 pm				and is filed under <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/events/" title="View all posts in Events" rel="category tag">Events</a>.<br />
				You can follow any responses to this entry through the <a href='http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/2012/02/17/symposium-on-international-arbitration-in-latin-america-february-23-2012/feed/'>RSS 2.0</a> feed.</p>
<p>									You can <a href="#respond">leave a response</a>, or <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/law/magazine/2012/02/17/symposium-on-international-arbitration-in-latin-america-february-23-2012/trackback/" rel="trackback">trackback</a> from your own site.</p>
<p>                &#8211;&gt;</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/utlaw-magazine-symposium-on-%e2%80%9cinternational-arbitration-in-latin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Reasons Why You Need Arbitration for a Construction Dispute &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/5-reasons-why-you-need-arbitration-for-a-construction-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/5-reasons-why-you-need-arbitration-for-a-construction-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/5-reasons-why-you-need-arbitration-for-a-construction-dispute/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we welcome another guest author to the blog– Jonathan Newby.  Jonathan is in the brokerage business, and runs a website relating to brokerage fees.  Thanks Jonathan for your sharing your thoughts today. Arbitration may be a better alternative to some construction disputes, assuming that you use a qualified and skilled arbitrator or arbitration panel.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="entry clear">
<p><em>Today we welcome another guest author to the blog– Jonathan Newby.  Jonathan is in the brokerage business, and runs a website relating to <a href="http://brokeragefees.org/" target="_blank">brokerage fees</a>.  Thanks Jonathan for your sharing your thoughts today.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://constructionlawnc.com/2012/02/18/5-reasons-arbitration/5-sign/" rel="attachment wp-att-2771"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2771" src="http://constructionlawnc.com/bwh-wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/5-sign-300x200.jpg" alt="5 sign" width="300" height="200" /></a>Arbitration may be a better alternative to some construction disputes, assuming that you use a qualified and skilled arbitrator or arbitration panel.  Here are five benefits for using arbitration over litigation:</p>
<ol>
<li>Arbitration means that the decision maker is an <strong>experienced</strong> industry professional instead of a lay jury.</li>
<li>Arbitration can provide better protection for your assets by <strong>minimizing your risk</strong> of large losses sometimes seen with jury verdicts.</li>
<li>Arbitration can provide <strong>flexibility</strong> in scheduling, versus court where you are told when and where to show up without much room to negotiate.</li>
<li>Arbitration can put <strong>an end to your case</strong> faster.  The time taken by an arbitrator is usually less than that to get a case to court to resolve a construction dispute.</li>
<li>Arbitration<strong> costs can be much less</strong> when compared to the one charged during any other legal process like litigation.</li>
</ol>
<p>These are five reasons why arbitration may be better for your construction dispute, so consider using an arbitration provision in your next construction contract.</p>
<p><strong><em>Editor’s Note:  <a href="http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/10/07/court-vs-arbitration/">As I’ve previously noted</a></em>, t<em>here are pros and cons to arbitration in lieu of trial.  The better venue is in part based on the type and size of contract, as well as numerous other subjective considerations.  Discuss whether arbitration is appropriate for you with your construction law attorney.</em></strong></p>
<p><em>Thoughts, comments, or questions?  Drop Jonathan or me a note in the comments section, below.  </em></p>
<p><span>Photo (c) <a href="http://www.freefoto.com" target="_blank"><span>freefoto.com</span></a>.</span></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p> </p>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/5-reasons-why-you-need-arbitration-for-a-construction-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supervisor harassment? You can force arbitration — Business &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/supervisor-harassment-you-can-force-arbitration-%e2%80%94-business/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/supervisor-harassment-you-can-force-arbitration-%e2%80%94-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/supervisor-harassment-you-can-force-arbitration-%e2%80%94-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers can use an arbitration clause to compel arbitration of al­­most all employment-related problems, including supervisor sexual harassment. That can limit the chance of a huge jury award. Recent case: Sophia Sewell signed an arbitration agreement with her employer that required arbitration of all claims involving employment. Later, she sued, alleging that her supervisor had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="format_text entry-content">
<p>Employers can use an arbitration clause to compel arbitration of al­­most all employment-related problems, including supervisor sexual harassment. That can limit the chance of a huge jury award.</p>
<p><b>Recent case:</b> Sophia Sewell signed an arbitration agreement with her employer that required arbitration of all claims involving employment.</p>
<p>Later, she sued, alleging that her supervisor had sexually harassed her until she felt forced to quit. The alleged sexual harassment took place at training seminars and other company-sponsored events.</p>
<p>The company asked the court to dis­­miss the case and send it to ar­­bi­­tra­­tion. That’s what the court did, since the arbitration agreement was broad enough to cover all employment-related claims, including sexual harassment if they were alleged to occur while on company business. (<i>IFMG Securities, et al., v. Sewell, </i>No. 13-10-00235, Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)</p>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/supervisor-harassment-you-can-force-arbitration-%e2%80%94-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Jays And Casey Janssen Avoid Arbitration, Agree On Two &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/blue-jays-and-casey-janssen-avoid-arbitration-agree-on-two/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/blue-jays-and-casey-janssen-avoid-arbitration-agree-on-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/blue-jays-and-casey-janssen-avoid-arbitration-agree-on-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Toronto Blue Jays will not be attending any arbitration hearings for the 15th year in a row after agreeing to a two-year contract with 30-year old reliever Casey Janssen worth $5.9 million. It includes a club option in 2014, which if picked up, will pay Janssen $4.0 million. Janssen has agreed to make an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="entry-body">
<div class="photo-tpl photo-tpl-right_landscape">
<p>      <a href="http://www.bluebirdbanter.com/photos/blue-jays-and-casey-janssen-avoid-arbitration-agree-on-two-year-5-9"><img alt="TORONTO,CANADA - APRIL 1:  Casey Janssen #44 of the Toronto Blue Jays tosses the ball to first base for an out against the Minnesota Twins slides on opening day during their MLB game at the Rogers Centre April 1, 2011 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.(Photo By Dave Sandford/Getty Images)" height="200" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/3056405/GYI0064169102_extra_large.jpg" width="300" /></a></p>
<div class="photo-meta">
<p class="photoby clearfix has-data-cap">
<p class="cap has-data-cap">
</p></div>
<p class="more-link has-data-cap">
</p></div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/toronto-blue-jays" class="sbn-auto-link">Toronto Blue Jays</a> will not be attending any arbitration hearings for the 15th year in a row after agreeing to a two-year contract with 30-year old reliever <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/players/1021/casey-janssen" class="sbn-auto-link">Casey Janssen</a> worth $5.9 million. It includes a club option in 2014, which if picked up, will pay Janssen $4.0 million. Janssen has agreed to make an annual donation to the Jays Care Foundation.</p>
<p>Welcome back, Casey! Time to splurge on a downtown condo.</p>
<p><i>Update</i>: According to <a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/" target="_blank">MLB Trade Rumors</a>, Janssen will earn $2 million in 2012 (splitting the middle between the arbitration figures) and $3.9 in 2013. He earned $1.095 million last season.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/blue-jays-and-casey-janssen-avoid-arbitration-agree-on-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ortiz, Red Sox Avoid Arbitration, Agree At $14575000 « CBS &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/ortiz-red-sox-avoid-arbitration-agree-at-14575000-%c2%ab-cbs/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/ortiz-red-sox-avoid-arbitration-agree-at-14575000-%c2%ab-cbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/ortiz-red-sox-avoid-arbitration-agree-at-14575000-%c2%ab-cbs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BOSTON (AP) — David Ortiz and the Boston Red Sox avoided salary arbitration by agreeing Monday to a one-year contract worth $14,575,000. The deal for the slugging designated hitter was midway between the $16.5 million he asked for last month and the $12.65 million submitted by the Red Sox, which matched his 2011 earnings. Ortiz [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="entry-content-textbox">
<p><!-- AddThis Button Begin --></p>
<p><strong>BOSTON (AP) —</strong> David Ortiz and the Boston Red Sox avoided salary arbitration by agreeing Monday to a one-year contract worth $14,575,000.</p>
<p>The deal for the slugging designated hitter was midway between the $16.5 million he asked for last month and the $12.65 million submitted by the Red Sox, which matched his 2011 earnings.</p>
<p>Ortiz became a free agent after the season then passed up a chance to go elsewhere when he accepted Boston’s arbitration offer on Dec. 7.</p>
<p>“I feel happy since I avoided going to arbitration,” he said on Monday, hours before the hearing had been scheduled to start in St. Petersburg, Fla. “People are used to see me with the Red Sox uniform and when you have so much time in one organization, and you’re identified with it, the best thing is to stay, even if it is for 1 or 2 million less.”</p>
<p>The Red Sox have not gone to an arbitration hearing in 10 years and have no unsigned players eligible for arbitration.</p>
<p>Ortiz hit .309 with 29 homers and 96 RBIs last year.</p>
<p>Signed as a free agent from the Minnesota Twins in 2003, the 36-year-old is entering his 10th season with the Red Sox.</p>
<p>“I figure I was gonna reach this deal, and that’s what we’re celebrating right now,” he said.</p>
<p>He played last season in the option year of a contract that paid him $65,225,000 over five seasons.</p>
<p>Ortiz remains in the middle of a Red Sox lineup that has undergone several changes since the team went 7-20 last September and missed the playoffs on the final day of the regular season.</p>
<p>Left fielder Carl Crawford is expected to miss the start of the season after surgery on his left wrist; shortstop Marco Scutaro was traded to Colorado; and catcher Jason Varitek and right fielder J.D. Drew were not re-signed.</p>
<p>But the first five batters in the lineup return led by center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury, who finished second in the AL MVP voting. Also back are second baseman Dustin Pedroia, first baseman Adrian Gonzalez and third baseman Kevin Youkilis.</p>
<p>Ortiz had an outstanding season after getting off to poor starts the previous two years.</p>
<p>He finished fourth in the AL in slugging and on-base percentage and sixth in batting average. His average, homers, RBIs, 162 hits, 70 extra-base hits, 40 doubles, .398 on-base percentage and .554 slugging percentage were all his highest totals in four years.</p>
<p>Ortiz is fifth in team history with 320 homers, 59 behind Dwight Evans for fourth place, and sixth with 1,028 RBIs, 219 behind Bobby Doerr for fifth place.</p>
<p>The 36-year-old accepted Boston’s offer of arbitration under the last year of the old collective bargaining agreement. Starting this fall, instead of arbitration teams may give their players qualifying offers equal to the average salary of the top 125 players ranked by salary.</p>
<p>Boston also has agreed to a minor league contract with right-hander John Maine, who has not been asked to attend big league camp.</p>
<p>He last pitched in the majors in 2010, starting nine games for the New York Mets before elbow surgery. Last year, he was 1-3 with a 7.43 ERA in 46 innings with Colorado’s Triple-A team at Colorado Springs. In five years with the Mets, Maine was 41-36 with a 4.35 ERA. His best season was 2007 when he went 15-10 with a 3.91 ERA.</p>
<p>(© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)</p>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/ortiz-red-sox-avoid-arbitration-agree-at-14575000-%c2%ab-cbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowell Loses Financial Services, International Arbitration Practice &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/crowell-loses-financial-services-international-arbitration-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/crowell-loses-financial-services-international-arbitration-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/crowell-loses-financial-services-international-arbitration-practice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#013; February 13, 2012 7:15 PM Crowell Loses Financial Services, International Arbitration Practice Leaders Posted by Brian Baxter Crowell Moring is losing a slew of lawyers, with former financial services chair William O’Connor leading a group to Thompson  Knight this week, while international arbitration chair Arif Hyder Ali and three other partners from his group are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="entry-content">&#013;</p>
<p>			<!-- content nav --></p>
<p>			<!-- entry --></p>
<p class="postline">February 13, 2012  7:15 PM</p>
<h3>Crowell Loses Financial Services, International Arbitration Practice Leaders</h3>
<p>Posted by Brian Baxter</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crowell.com/" target="_blank">Crowell  Moring</a> is losing a slew of lawyers, with former financial  services chair William O’Connor leading a group to <a href="http://www.tklaw.com/" target="_blank">Thompson  Knight</a> this week, while international arbitration chair Arif Hyder Ali and three other partners from his group are headed to <a href="http://www.weil.com/" target="_blank">Weil, Gotshal  Manges</a> within the next two weeks.</p>
<p>Reached by phone in Miami, where he was boarding a flight to New York, O’Connor confirmed Monday that he is leaving Crowell. Joining him in making the move to Thompson  Knight is New Yorkâ€“based financial services and litigation partner Evelyn Seeler.</p>
<p>“I’ll know more [about other attorneys leaving] by Wednesday,” said O’Connor, who will cohead Thompson  Knight’s 40-lawyer real estate and business transactions practice with current partner Mark Weibel in New York.</p>
<p>O’Connor says that he spoke</p>
<p>Read More from the Article Source: <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2012/02/crowell-departures.html">http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2012/02/crowell-departures.html</a></p>
<p>						<br class="clear" /></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/crowell-loses-financial-services-international-arbitration-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Ortiz Arbitration Hearing Scheduled For Monday &#8211; Over the &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/david-ortiz-arbitration-hearing-scheduled-for-monday-over-the/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/david-ortiz-arbitration-hearing-scheduled-for-monday-over-the/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/david-ortiz-arbitration-hearing-scheduled-for-monday-over-the/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authors lone1c gizmosandy Mattsullivan Matthew Kory BrendanOToole Cee Angi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="col">
<h3>Authors</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/lone1c"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/profile_images/391021/lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/lone1c">lone1c</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/gizmosandy"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Jddrew_small" src="http://cdn3.sbnation.com/profile_images/531291/jddrew_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/gizmosandy">gizmosandy</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Mattsullivan"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Pedoria1_small" src="http://cdn3.sbnation.com/profile_images/282455/Pedoria1_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Mattsullivan">Mattsullivan</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Matthew%20Kory"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Baghead-1_small" src="http://cdn3.sbnation.com/profile_images/440374/baghead-1_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Matthew%20Kory">Matthew Kory</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/BrendanOToole"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Photo__2__small" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/profile_images/588991/photo__2__small.JPG" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/BrendanOToole">BrendanOToole</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Cee%20Angi"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Cee_small" src="http://cdn2.sbnation.com/profile_images/562833/Cee_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Cee%20Angi">Cee Angi</a> </p>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/david-ortiz-arbitration-hearing-scheduled-for-monday-over-the/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twins, Alexi Casilla Head to Arbitration &#8211; Twinkie Town</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/twins-alexi-casilla-head-to-arbitration-twinkie-town/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/twins-alexi-casilla-head-to-arbitration-twinkie-town/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/twins-alexi-casilla-head-to-arbitration-twinkie-town/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#8217;t happen often, but every few years the Twins can&#8217;t work through an arbitration case with a player and they go through the arbitration process. The last player that wasn&#8217;t able to find a midway point was Kyle Lohse back in both 2005 and 2006, which wasn&#8217;t a surprise at the time. &#013; Casilla [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="entry-body">
<div class="photo-tpl photo-tpl-banner">
<p>      <a href="http://www.twinkietown.com/photos/twins-alexi-casilla-head-to-arbitration"><img alt="Salary offers find the gap between Casilla's camp and the Twins." height="150" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/3014833/227435_Brewers_Twins_Baseball.jpg" width="450" /></a></p>
<div class="photo-meta">
<p class="photoby clearfix has-data-cap">
<p class="cap has-data-cap">
</p></div>
<p class="more-link has-data-cap">
</p></div>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t happen often, but every few years the <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/minnesota-twins" class="sbn-auto-link">Twins</a> can&#8217;t work through an arbitration case with a player and they go through the arbitration process. The last player that wasn&#8217;t able to find a midway point was <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/players/449/kyle-lohse" class="sbn-auto-link">Kyle Lohse</a> back in both 2005 and 2006, which wasn&#8217;t a surprise at the time.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>Casilla made $865,000, and after hitting .260/.322/.368 with a pair of homers, 21 RBI and 15 stolen bases in 97 games last season has submitted $1.75 million for his 2012 salary. The Twins offered $1.065 million. For an objective look into these numbers, in an effort to see which side is most likely to come out of the arbitration hearing as a winner, let&#8217;s look at a comp list that we&#8217;ll swipe from <a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/02/alexi-casilla-jed-lowrie-head-to-arbitration.html" target="_blank">MLBTR&#8217;s post earlier today</a>.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>Join us for the breakdown after the jump.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p class="extend-divide"><a name="storyjump" id="storyjump"></a><img alt="Star-divide" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/images/blog/star-divide.v5e9d7f1.jpg" /></p>
<p>    &#013;</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>None of these infielders had particularly successful campaigns in their previous season, but of course received raisese regardless. Miles, in his age-30 season, hit .290 with a pair of homers in 133 games. Amezaga hit .264 with three homers in 125 games, in his age-29 season. Baker (also 29) hit .272 with four homers in 79 games. Casilla, Miles, and Amezaga all had an OPS under .700, while Baker managed .739.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<h4>Casilla&#8217;s potential raises</h4>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p><em><strong>Casilla Wins:</strong> $1.75 million, 102% raise<br /><strong>Twins Win:</strong> $1.065 million, 23% raise<br /><strong>Midway:</strong> $1.407 million, 63% raise</em></p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe that either <a href="http://www.twinkietown.com/2012/1/18/2715688/twins-avoid-arbitration-with-perkins-and-liriano-exchange-figures" target="_blank">the Twins or Casilla would go to arbitration over $700,000</a>, but that&#8217;s exactly what&#8217;s happening. Considering that the midway point would have constituted a 63% raise, that&#8217;s already more than a fair increase based on Casilla&#8217;s history. Either the Twins took a hard line ofer that $350,000, or Casilla&#8217;s side did.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that Minnesota&#8217;s numbers come in a little low. A 23% raise, even considering Casilla&#8217;s mediocre performance (he hit worse than the average second baseman in both the American and National Leagues), is below what players expect. But that&#8217;s how the game is played.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>Conversely, players are expected to submit numbers slightly higher than they&#8217;d expect. This is where the issue is, because Casilla&#8217;s agent is looking for his salary to double in spite of the fact that he&#8217;s done nothing remotely close to earning that kind of compensation.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>Going back to Baker, who received a raise much larger than Miles or Amezaga, his raise was huge in some part because arbitration doesn&#8217;t just look at the prior season &#8211; it also looks at the season before that. Which means that his 79% increase was due in some part to hitting .305/.362/.448 with the <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/chicago-cubs" class="sbn-auto-link">Cubs</a> in &#8217;09.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>Casilla, in spite of having a slightly better &#8217;10 (.276/.331/.395 in just 69 games), can&#8217;t boast that his numbers justify his raise.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a disconnect between what Casilla&#8217;s agent believes Alexi is worth, and what he is actually worth. If Casilla&#8217;s camp had come in a bit closer to reality (asking for a 60% raise would have given Casilla approximately a $1.4 million salary), then I have no doubt that the two sides would have come to an agreement already. Instead, a process which isn&#8217;t supposed to be personal will be. When two opposing sides are talking about a player&#8217;s value, it&#8217;s impossible for it to not be at least a little personal. It&#8217;s opening a door that can&#8217;t be closed, and who knows what will come out the other side.</p>
<p>&#013;</p>
<p>The Twins offer is low. But they should win this hearing, as much as arbitration cases can be won &#8211; in terms of money &#8211; because Casilla&#8217;s camp came in so ridiculously high. It&#8217;s not the dollars in this case; $700,000 isn&#8217;t a massive gap, and the $350,000 difference to the midway point is almost negligible to a team&#8217;s payroll. The difference is in the percentages, and calling this judgement just seems too easy.</p>
<fieldset>
<legend>Poll</legend>
<h5 class="poll-title">If you were in charge of the arbitration panel, who would you rule in favor of?</h5>
</fieldset>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/twins-alexi-casilla-head-to-arbitration-twinkie-town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“If I win in arbitration, must I sign away my rights?” &gt; Sklover Working &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/%e2%80%9cif-i-win-in-arbitration-must-i-sign-away-my-rights%e2%80%9d-sklover-working/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/%e2%80%9cif-i-win-in-arbitration-must-i-sign-away-my-rights%e2%80%9d-sklover-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/%e2%80%9cif-i-win-in-arbitration-must-i-sign-away-my-rights%e2%80%9d-sklover-working/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#013; &#013; Question: I reported sexual harassment and false evaluations. I also got two disciplinary write-ups that were trumped up. I just went through an arbitration, and won the right to be reinstated into my job. In order to get what I won in arbitration, can they make me sign away my employee rights? M.B. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="post-content">&#013;<br />
				&#013;</p>
<p><strong>Question: </strong>I reported sexual harassment and false evaluations. I also got two disciplinary write-ups that were trumped up. I just went through an arbitration, and won the right to be reinstated into my job.</p>
<p>In order to get what I won in arbitration, can they make me sign away my employee rights?</p>
<p>M.B.<br />
Safford, Arizona</p>
<p><strong>Answer: </strong>M.B.: First and foremost, congratulations on standing up to both sexual harassment and false evaluations!! The more that people stand up for themselves at work, the easier it will be for others to do so. In fact, the more that people stand up for themselves at work, the less that other people will have to. Hat’s off to you!!</p>
<p>Now, let me address your question:</p>
<p>1. <strong>When an employee and an employer settle a dispute between themselves – without having to go through a full arbitration or a trial – almost always, as part of the settlement deal, the employer wants, and gets, a full waiver and release of all other claims. </strong>This is part of every kind of settlement, whether it is over a car accident or malpractice by a doctor. The idea is this: if we are going to settle, we are going to FULLY settle. So, when things are settled, a full waiver and release of other claims is almost always part of “the deal.” Otherwise, the parties would be concerned that a new arbitration or litigation would start the next day, and the fighting would never be over. It’s like a peace treaty at the end of a war.   </p>
<p>2. <strong>However, when an arbitration panel renders an “award,” or a jury renders a judgment (such as your reinstatement), the employer cannot then place conditions – such as a waiver or release of other claims – on its obeying the judgment. </strong>By that time, it’s just too late. When the employee wins – like you did – the employer has no say in the terms or the conditions of the final award or judgment. It lost its chance to do just that when it failed to settle beforehand.   </p>
<p>3. <strong>But, you must read the arbitration “award” of the arbitrators carefully, for it might cut off certain of your “rights.” </strong>It is possible that you (or your attorney) raised, say, four claims, and that the arbitration award dismissed three of the four. In that case, you would have no right to again raise any of those other claims. Also, arbitrators’ authority to make any “award” they wish – even an award that might cut off certain of your rights –<strong> </strong>is almost unlimited. You, and your attorney if you used one, must read the arbitration “award” very carefully to ensure you know what it is you won, and whether the award, itself, might have cut off any of your future rights.</p>
<p>M.B., bottom line is you won, and you have a right to whatever you won without your employer now having any right or way to put “strings” on your getting what you won. It had a chance to settle, but failed to do so. That was their mistake, and your good fortune for standing up and lasting it out.</p>
<p>Again, M.B., hats off to you!! Hope this helps. Thanks for writing in. </p>
<p>Best,<br />
Al Sklover</p>
<p>P.S.: Need <strong>Domain Name registration</strong>, <strong>Web Design or Internet Hosting</strong> <strong>Services? </strong>Consider clicking our Display Ad for <strong><a href="http://www.anrdoezrs.net/click-4735703-10730841" target="_blank">GoDADDY.com</a></strong>. They <strong>help us help you. </strong>    </p>
<p><strong>Repairing the World – </strong><br /><strong>One Empowered and Productive Employee at a Time ™ </strong></p>
<p>© 2012 Alan L. Sklover, All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p><span><img src="http://skloverworkingwisdom.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wp-spamfree/img/wpsf-img.php" width="0" height="0" alt="" /></span>&#013;<br />
				&#013;<br />
				&#013;<br />
&#013;
		</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/%e2%80%9cif-i-win-in-arbitration-must-i-sign-away-my-rights%e2%80%9d-sklover-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rays Win Arbitration Hearing With Jeff Niemann &#8211; DRaysBay</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/rays-win-arbitration-hearing-with-jeff-niemann-draysbay/</link>
		<comments>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/rays-win-arbitration-hearing-with-jeff-niemann-draysbay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/rays-win-arbitration-hearing-with-jeff-niemann-draysbay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analysts rglass44 EminenceFront Mulva Imperialism32 MrNegative1 CBJones Whelk PGP mr. maniac jcmitchell John Gregg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="col">
<h3>Analysts</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/rglass44"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Lob-city_design_small" src="http://cdn2.sbnation.com/profile_images/560707/lob-city_design_small.png" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/rglass44">rglass44</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/EminenceFront"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Untitled_small" src="http://cdn2.sbnation.com/profile_images/468459/Untitled_small.png" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/EminenceFront">EminenceFront</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Mulva"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Small" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/images/sbn/placeholders/profile/small.v60cb52e.gif" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Mulva">Mulva</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Imperialism32"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Rutg_uakjmedjwh9ndzd4lkll_small" src="http://cdn3.sbnation.com/profile_images/95223/Rutg_uakjmedjwh9ndzd4lkll_small.gif" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Imperialism32">Imperialism32</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/MrNegative1"><span class="thumb"><img alt="100_1952_small" src="http://cdn3.sbnation.com/profile_images/476862/100_1952_small.JPG" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/MrNegative1">MrNegative1</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/CBJones"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Steak-with-crown_small" src="http://cdn2.sbnation.com/profile_images/355861/steak-with-crown_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/CBJones">CBJones</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Whelk"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Whelk_small" src="http://cdn0.sbnation.com/profile_images/279575/Whelk_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/Whelk">Whelk</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/PGP"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Small" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/images/sbn/placeholders/profile/small.v60cb52e.gif" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/PGP">PGP</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/mr.%20maniac"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Scaled_php_small" src="http://cdn2.sbnation.com/profile_images/461784/scaled_php_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/mr.%20maniac">mr. maniac</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/jcmitchell"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Tampa_theatre_small" src="http://cdn0.sbnation.com/profile_images/68128/tampa_theatre_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/jcmitchell">jcmitchell</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/John%20Gregg"><span class="thumb"><img alt="Me_small" src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/profile_images/424673/me_small.jpg" /></span></a> <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/users/John%20Gregg">John Gregg</a> </p>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arbitrationlaw.info/uncategorized/rays-win-arbitration-hearing-with-jeff-niemann-draysbay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

